I D
Access Premium Content

Research Library

The top resource for free research, white papers, reports, case studies, magazines, and eBooks.

Share Your Content with Us
on TradePub.com for readers like you. LEARN MORE
Frost & Sullivan Makes the Case for Arctic Wolf's SOC-as-a-Service over DIY SOC

Request Your Free Report Now:

"Frost & Sullivan Makes the Case for Arctic Wolf's SOC-as-a-Service over DIY SOC"

The Business Case for AWN CyberSOC is Compelling.

The right people, processes, and technology. Those are the components of a security operations center (SOC), and they’re what every company needs to monitor, detect, and respond to today’s cyberthreats. The problem? Unless you’re among the Fortune 500, a SOC can be expensive to build and extremely difficult to manage.

Frost & Sullivan recently interviewed Arctic Wolf customers as they conducted a 3-year total-cost-of-ownership (TCO) analysis of building your own SOC versus buying Arctic Wolf’s SOC-as-a-service. In this report, Mike Suby, the VP of Research at Frost & Sullivan, appraises all the variables that go into the total cost of ownership of a SOC and concludes:

  • A DIY approach costs up to 9X more than Arctic Wolf’s AWN CyberSOC™ service
  • SOC expertise/staffing is the greatest cost consideration
  • SOC-as-a-service customers experience high rates of satisfaction


Offered Free by: Arctic Wolf Networks, Inc
See All Resources from: Arctic Wolf Networks, Inc

Recommended for Professionals Like You: